So as i was researching for a mod west essay i had to write earlier today about how the enlightenment impacts pop culture, i came across an essay comparing Calvin and Hobbes to the movie Fight Club.
According to the author of this piece of crap essay, Edward Norton's character is a grown-up Calvin and Brad Pitt's character is Hobbes reincarnated.
I don't even know where to start.
First of all the essay creates a made-up story-line about the time in between the cartoon and the movie, and what spawned Hobbes' tragic demise asa tiger and triumphant return as a bad-ass.
The essay points out several similarities, that are either too broad or too vague, between the cartoon and the movie. And although claiming to be a Calvin and Hobbes fan, the author has absolutely no respect for Bill Watterson's work and should be ashamed for ever having made up this rediculous theory. He should've just let the cartoon be what it is, and not have over analyzed the movie. which by the way is a good movie, with an ORIGINAL story.
if you wanna read it, it's here:
http://metaphilm.com/philm.php?id=29_0_2_0My rant for the day.